EPLAW PATENT BLOG

UK – Napp v. Dr Reddy’s and Sandoz

Posted: November 7th, 2016

Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v Dr Reddy’s Laboratories (UK) Limited and Sandoz Limited, England & Wales Court of Appeal, London, UK, 1 November 2016, Neutral Citation Number [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 This was an appeal from a decision of Arnold J holding that there was no infringement of European Patent (UK) 2 305 194 (‘the […]

READ MORE

NL – Vertidrive v. Waterjet

Posted: October 31st, 2016

Vertidrive B.V. v. Waterjet Robotics USA LLC., Preliminary Relief Judge District Court of The Hague, the Netherlands, 20 October 2016, Case number C/09/515824 / KG ZA 16-956 Waterjet is the holder of the European patent with number 1 409 330 entitled “Air gap magnetic mobile robot”. Vertidrive develops and markets remote controlled magnetic robots for […]

READ MORE

UK – Nicocigs v. Fontem

Posted: September 13th, 2016

Nicocigs Limited v. Fontem Holdings 1 BV, UK Patents Court, Mr John Baldwin QC, 2 September 2016, 2016 EWHC 2161 (Pat) In this action Nicocigs sought to revoke European Patent (UK) 2 022 349 and/or a declaration that its products did not infringe the patent.  The patent concerned electronic cigarettes, a market that has expanded […]

READ MORE

FR – France Brevets and Ms W. v. Nintendo

Posted: September 1st, 2016

France Brevets fails in its attempt to get more than €80,000,000 from Nintendo in Wii Balance Board-related patent dispute as a result of file wrapper estoppel Ms W. and France Brevets v. Nintendo France and Nintendo of Europe, judgment of the tribunal de grande instance de Paris dated 26 May 2016, docket № 14/05090, with […]

READ MORE

UK – Napp v. Dr Reddy’s / Sandoz

Posted: August 3rd, 2016

Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy’s Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited. UK Patents Court (Arnold J). Case neutral citation number: [2016] EWHC 1517 (Pat) In a decision that considers both numerical ranges and de minimis patent infringement, the UK Patents Court has held that products (7 day buprenorphine transdermal patches) proposed to […]

READ MORE

NL – Tata Steel v. Arcelormittal

Posted: July 30th, 2016

Tata Steel IJmuiden B.V. v. Arcelormittal France, District Court The Hague, 20 July 2016, Case No. ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2016:8116 Tata Steel has a legitimate interest in a negative declaratory judgment -even if there is no specific product yet- in view of the huge investments it is about to make. Art. 7(2) EEX Regulation II applies also to […]

READ MORE

NL – JP Russel v. Innovet

Posted: April 8th, 2016

JP Russel Science Ltd. v. Innovet Italia S.r.l., District Court of The Hague, the Netherlands, 30 March 2016, Case number 481573 / HA ZA 15-111 JP Russel develops and markets nutricial supplements and dietetics for medical use. One of the products sold by JP Russel on the Dutch market is PEAPURE, a product that includes […]

READ MORE

UK – Bapco v. Selpac

Posted: March 31st, 2016

(1) Bapco Closures Research Limited (2) Aptargroup, Inc. and Aptargroup Inc. v Selpac Europe Limited, High Court of England and Wales, Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Douglas Campbell QC Deputy Judge) 18 March 2016, neutral citation No. [2016] EWHC 550 (IPEC). The specialist Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) in London had to consider whether a word […]

READ MORE

FR – Warner-Lambert Company and Pfizer v. Sandoz

Posted: March 30th, 2016

Lyrica® in France: Pfizer fails in preliminary injunction proceedings based on EP 0 934 061 covering a second medical use of pregabalin for pain Warner-Lambert Company & Pfizer v. Sandoz, order of the presiding judge of the tribunal de grande instance de Paris of 26 October 2015, Docket № 15/58725, with thanks to Pierre Véron, […]

READ MORE