EPLAW PATENT BLOG

NL – Asetek v. Cooler Master Europe

Posted: September 29th, 2017

Asetek A/S v. Cooler Master Europe B.V., District Court of The Hague, the Netherlands, 20 September 2017, Case number C/09/515892 / HA ZA 16-906 Asetek is the holder of the European patent EP 1 923 771 B1 (“EP ‘771”) entitled “Cooling system for a computer system”. The patent was filed on 8 November 2004 relying […]

READ MORE

BE – FN Herstal vs Heckler & Koch

Posted: September 22nd, 2017

SA FN Herstal v. Heckler & Koch GmbH, Tribunal de Commerce Francophone de Bruxelles, 28 April 2017 Combination invention vs. mere aggregation of features in patent law On 28 April 2017, the French-speaking Court of commerce of Brussels rendered a judgment in a patent case opposing the Belgian weapon manufacturer FN Herstal to its German […]

READ MORE

NL – Swiss Pharma v. Biogen

Posted: July 17th, 2017

Swiss Pharma International v. Biogen MA Inc., District Court The Hague, the Netherlands, 12 July 2017, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:7628 Biogen holds EP 1485127, which relates to the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (“MS”). Swiss Pharma seeks to invalidate the Dutch part of the patent. Claims 1, 3 and 4 are invalidated due to lack of novelty as these […]

READ MORE

IT – INTERMARINE v. CMC MARINE

Posted: July 5th, 2017

Intermarine S.p.A. (formerly Rodriquez Cantieri Navali S.p.A.) v. CMC Marine S.r.l.. Court of Appeal of Turin, Italy, 22 June 2017, Judgement no. 106/2016 With its writ of summons in the first instance proceedings, Intermarine demanded the Court of Turin a declaration of invalidity of a utility model owned by CMC. Said utility model related to […]

READ MORE

NL – Carl Zeiss v. VSY

Posted: June 9th, 2017

Carl Zeiss Meditec AG v. VSY Biotechnology B.V. et al., District Court The Hague, The Netherlands, 7 June 2017, Case No. ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:6136 European Patent on an intraocular (implantable) lens. Interpretation of claims. The Dutch part of the patent is valid: the hurdles of novelty, inventive step and enablement were all taken successfully. The patent is […]

READ MORE

NL – Philips v. Wiko, Archos, Asustek

Posted: March 29th, 2017

Koninklijke Philips NV v. Wiko SAS, Case no. ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:2719, Koninklijke Philips NV v. Archos S.A., Case no. ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:2720, Koninklijke Philips NV v. Asustek Computer Inc., Asus Europe B.V. and Asus Holland B.V., Case no. ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:2721, District Court The Hague, 22 March 2017 The present dispute concerns an alleged infringement of the rights of Koninklijke Philips […]

READ MORE

UK – Edwards Lifesciences LLC v Boston Scientific

Posted: March 7th, 2017

Edwards Lifesciences LLC v Boston Scientific Scimed Inc, UK, High Court, Hacon HHJ sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, 3 March 2017 These proceedings concerned an application brought by Edwards Lifesciences LLC (“Edwards”) seeking revocation of two European Patents (UK) – EP (UK) 2 749 254 and EP (UK) 2 926 766 – owned […]

READ MORE

GR – Novartis & Novartis Hellas v. GPH

Posted: February 16th, 2017

Novartis AG & Novartis Hellas SA v. GPH Ltd, Greece , First Instance Court of Athens (temporary relief proceedings), 21 December 2016, Judgment No. 8512/2016 Novartis AG and its Greek subsidiary, Novartis Hellas,  initiated successful temporary relief proceedings against GPH Ltd in defense of their rights to EP No. 2292219 (EP 219), which covers a […]

READ MORE

UK – Jushi Group v. OCV Intellectual Capital

Posted: February 16th, 2017

Jushi Group Co., Ltd v OCV Intellectual Capital, LLC, Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (HHJ Hacon), 6 February 2017, Neutral Citation Number [2017] EWHC 171 (IPEC) This case is interesting for the approach taken by the UK court in a situation where the patent in suit claims ranges that overlap with ranges disclosed in the prior […]

READ MORE