Posted: October 7th, 2021
Optis Cellular v Apple Retail [2021] EWHC 2564 (Pat) In a lengthy and complex decision reaching over 80 pages, Mr Justice Meade has given judgment in the latest in a series of trials in the UK’s Patents Court between the claimants (“Optis”) and defendants (“Apple”) concerning Optis’ standard essential patents (SEPs) and the FRAND obligations […]
READ MOREPosted: October 5th, 2020
Nokia v. Daimler, District Court of Mannheim, dec. of August 18, 2020, case docket 2 O 34/19 On August 18, 2020, the District Court of Mannheim handed down the first judgment in the current litigation campaign of Nokia v. Daimler. Despite Daimler’s FRAND defense, the Court enjoined Daimler from using a certain technology in Daimler […]
READ MOREPosted: April 11th, 2019
TQ Delta, LLC v ZyXEL Communications Limited & Anor [2019] EWHC 745 (Pat), 18 March 2019 In this judgment Mr Justice Carr granted an injunction against ZyXEL, following on from his earlier decision that TQ Delta’s EP (UK) 1,453,268 (“the 268 Patent”) was valid, essential and infringed. See our previous headnote here. ZyXEL submitted that […]
READ MOREPosted: June 8th, 2018
Edwards Lifesciences LLC v. Boston Scientific Scimed Inc, High Court of Justice, London, UK, 24 May 2018, [2018] EWHC 1256 (Pat) In this judgment of 24 May 2018, the latest in a saga during which the Court of Appeal had upheld an infringement decision of the Patents Court, Arnold J determined the details of a […]
READ MOREPosted: June 4th, 2018
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc v Kymab Limited and Novo Nordisk A/S, UK Court of Appeal, 23 May 2018, [2018] EWCA 1186 (Civ) This is a judgment from the Court of Appeal on the appropriate form of order to be made following its finding that two of Regeneron’s patents are valid and infringed. At first instance, Henry […]
READ MORE
EMAIL US
