Posted: June 22nd, 2017
Hygro International PTY Limited v. Futurecare Worldwide B.V. et al., District Court The Hague, The Netherlands, 21 June 2017, Case No. ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:6743
Futurecare did not respond to Hygro’s rebuttal of Futurecare’s invalidity arguments. Hygro therefore sufficiently established that it is entitled to the patent.
Futurecare further did not dispute that the products marketed by them fall within the scope of the claims, nor did they bring forward other grounds to dispute that Futurecare infringes the patent. Therewith, patent infringement is established.
A copy of the case can be read here.