EPLAW PATENT BLOG

EPO – Board of Appeal T 1143/06 / Data selection system

Posted: April 1st, 2009

EPO, Board of Appeal 3.5.01, 1 April 2009, Docket No. T 1143/06 – Data selection system
The Board confirmed a strict approach regarding the treatment of features relating to a presentation of information in view of inventiveness and confronted the more liberal view expressed by a different Board. In the present case, the deciding Board held that a feature which relates to the manner how cognitive content is conveyed to the user on a screen normally does not contribute to a technical solution to a technical problem.

READ MORE

FR – Johnson&Johnson v. Novartis

Posted: March 25th, 2009

Johnson&Johnson c.s. v. Novartis, infringement and invalidity proceedings, Tribunal de Grande Instance, Paris, France, 25 March 2009, Docket No. 07/13504, with thanks to Pierre Véron, Véron & Associés This action is part of the wider (ophthalmic lens) dispute between the same parties in the US, Australia and various European countries (Germany, Britain and Italy). Although […]

READ MORE

DE – Italian Torpedo

Posted: March 17th, 2009

Italienischer Torpedo/Italian Torpedo – patent infringement, Düsseldorf Regional Court, Germany, 17 March 2009, Case No.: 4b O 218/08  The only factual requirements pursuant to Article 27 Council Regulation (EC) no. 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters are the identity of the parties and […]

READ MORE

FR – Institut Pasteur v. Chiron

Posted: March 4th, 2009

Institut Pasteur v. Chiron Healthcare c.s., appeal in infringement proceedings, Cour d'Appel, Paris, France, 4 March 2009, Docket No. 07/08437, with thanks to Pierre Véron, Véron & Associés Even a pioneer patent cannot be granted a general scope if its claims are drafted using restrictive words. A non-ambiguous claim with a narrow scope cannot be […]

READ MORE

DE – Standards and FRAND

Posted: February 27th, 2009

Infringement proceedings (Standards and FRAND), Mannheim Regional Court, Germany, 27 February 2009, Case No.: 7 O 94/08 The declaration by the owner of a patent vis-à-vis a standardisation organisation to grant a licence to any interested party at conditions which are fair, reasonable and not discriminating is not in rem disposition over the patent, but […]

READ MORE

DE – Infringement / Patent Troll

Posted: February 27th, 2009

Infringement proceedings (patent troll), Mannheim Regional Court, Germany, 27 February 2009, Case No.: 7 O 94/08
Even a patent licensing company which does not produce or sell patented products has a right to injunctive relief vis-à-vis third parties if there is a patent infringement. It is neither harassment

READ MORE

DE – Mannheim / determining validity before expiry of opposition time limit

Posted: February 27th, 2009

Infringement proceedings (preliminary injunction), Mannheim Regional Court, 27 February 2009, Case No.: 7 O 29/09
As a rule the validity which has to be determined positively for a preliminary cease-and-desist order may not be ascertained on the basis of a patent which

READ MORE

UK – Generics (UK) Limited and others v H Lundbeck A/S – House of Lords

Posted: February 25th, 2009

Generics (UK) Limited and others (Appellants) v H Lundbeck A/S (Respondents), House of Lords, UK, Case No. [2009] UKHL 12, with thanks to Marc Döring and Kevin Mooney, Simmons & Simmons
The Court of Appeal decision in Generics (UK) Limited v Lundbeck A/S followed

READ MORE

UK – James Duncan Kelly v. GE Health Care / Employee invention

Posted: February 11th, 2009

James Duncan Kelly and Kwok Wai Chiu v. GE Health Care Limited,High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Patents Court, 11 February 2009, Case No. [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat), with thanks to Marc Döring and Rowen Freeland, Simmons & Simmons

READ MORE

FR – Agilent & Hewlett- Packard v. Waters

Posted: January 14th, 2009

Agilent Technologies Deutschland GmbH and Hewlett-Packard GmbH v. Waters Corporation and Waters SAS, calculation of damages, Tribunal de Grande Instance, Paris, France, 14 January 2009, Docket No. 97/20725, with thanks to Pierre Véron, Véron & Associés The compensation granted to the patentee for the loss of profit caused by the infringement may be calculated on […]

READ MORE